On The Right to Self-Protection Blog
Think – Because Survival Isn't a Sport

The Mecca of the West


The repeated defiance of the world’s leadership to recognize and name the current fight against totalitarian theocracy is endangering people in every nation that has any place for freedom in its belief structures.  Training individuals, specialists and groups in hand to hand combat survival is my forte and passion.  It requires me to recognize all aspects of the situational arena in which one lives to instruct effectively.  The mindset and ethos required to defend against asocial violence must possess an understanding of the philosophical principles that form the social context people try to maintain to prevent the chaos of an amoral society.  The reason for this need to understand the functioning reasons behind social constraints is to recognize when the contract is being breeched and thus the constraints to asocial response removed.

The very first principle to be successful in defending oneself in any kind of asocial attack is to recognize that there is an attack underway.  This is the quintessential act which precedes all others.  If you don’t know you are being attacked you are going to be the unwitting victim.  In many instances, this would be like the barrister in England who refused to recognize the asocial nature of the attack when, giving the two criminals his watch, wallet and everything else of value was repeatedly stabbed and died asking why they were doing this since he had complied with their demands.  He did not recognize the attack as something to ACT against, rather he still thought of the exchange as a social event to be dealt with on a social level, through discourse.  As Ayn Rand would advise, recognize that A is A.  You cannot change fact or truth by wishing or rhetorical device.

The second is to realize that it was a course chosen actively by the person who is acting, with complete disregard for the value structure, moral and ethical code you have chosen to live your life by.  They seek only to impose their will by use of force without moral consideration.  Criminals, terrorists, theocrats, union goons, politicians who see bureaucracy as a self-fulfilling and self-vindicating institution which may use overt force to compel their citizenry; all are examples of groups who chose at some level to function amorally.  And because they have chosen to step outside the bounds of the social doctrine and use violence to inflict trauma and their will upon others, they have given up the right to insist on being treated with the rights and privileges of citizenry and can be acted upon by their intended victim without that victim having to worry about guilt or social condemnation for their actions.  Only active, intent response can counter an intent initiative of action.  A is A.

This is the crux of self-defense on a personal level.

I submit that it is no different on a national level or cultural level.  We are in a conflict of cultures that has been actively pursued for roughly 1400 years.  Many of our ancestors faced this very threat and have twice repelled the massive military onslaughts against the religious and social constructs of any nation who did not submit to their demands.  The reason for their success was simple, they recognized the attacks as attacks and responded in order to defeat them using all such measures as was necessary in a force on force setting.  They did not talk nor concern themselves with anything other than the reality of the moment; this culture seeks to kill us, our culture must kill them.  Just like street violence, one wins and asserts their will, one loses and submits to the trauma, either dying or surviving in dhimmitude.

We are not fighting a branch of Islam, we are fighting the cultural reality of what Islam and its jurisprudence are; a system of world government that compels through force the compliance of its membership, the systemic destruction of any other competing social hierarchy and killing of all who would actively oppose it through whatever means necessary.  It consists of the theocratic guidance of the Qu’ran, the social interaction dictates of the Shari’ah, and the indoctrinal expectations of the Hadiths. 

Islam is not a religion in the sense that the western hemisphere recognizes a religion.  There can be no separation of church and state under Islam, to do so would directly counter the jurisprudence of the Islamic tenets and understanding of what Islam is.  The state is for all intents and purposes Allah and his expression on earth of Islam is compliance to and of the state to the principles laid out by the warlord Mohammed when he began constructing his doctrinal writings after achieving military victory over contended trade routes.

Until we recognize and name this fact as something that this is EXACTLY what our leaders say it is not, a cultural battle that can have only one survivor where Islam and another belief system/culture intersect, we will continue to enable those who see us as less than. 

We cannot co-exist with those who are doctrinally correct in their Islamic faith.  The “moderate Muslims” we are told are around us may not support the drive of expansion and destruction of all non-Islamic cultures, but they are moderates only insofar as they choose to disregard the instruction of the Islamic tenets. The Qu’ran specifically admonishes Muslims to never regard any non-Muslim as friend and to use the Qu’ran to lie to enemies if the goal is in fact to spread Islam and further the goals of establishing Islamic hegemony throughout the world as one Islamic nation.  Times where violence has not been ongoing are dictated by the Qur’an itself; when the Islamic forces are weak and in disarray they may seek peace to regroup, of a period not more than 10 years in length, but they may never seek peace in a time of military superiority.  Since each act of jihad is considered an act of war for the expansion of Islam, regardless of the location of the violence, it does not take too much effort to trace the doctrinal adherence to this policy.

The naming of the “Western Mecca” as some are calling the new mosque to be built on the site of the 9/11 attacks in New York City is a statement of staggering proportions on multiple levels.  First, the date of attack being the anniversary of the breaking of the Siege of Vienna and the dedication of the mosque scheduled for this date are brazen statements to the Islamic faithful.  It tells them that Islam is again on the expansion to claim all of the earth for Allah after the terrible defeat and retraction suffered post 1638 ADand the first efforts of the Umayyad Caliphate defeated by the Christian Carolingian Franks Martel at the Battle of Tours  in 732 AD (also known as the Battle of Poitiers or to Muslims as the Battle of Court of the Martyrs).  Secondly, and most disturbing from the perspective of societal survival, is the compliance and ignorance of the western world population and its leadership in this current trend.  The Islamic world will see this as a willingness to be subjugated, and with subjugation, acceptance of the reality that either a state of dhimmitude will exist until our culture is completely erased, or the purging through slaughter as was and is seen in the majority of the caliphate expansionism of Islam.

 We need to name this cultural nemesis.  We need to recognize the big picture in this and how its 1400 years drive to become the world dominant force can and is being harnessed by another country which sees itself as doctrinally committed to actively pursuing an asymmetrical war against the United States; China.  We need to fight it with the understanding it will show us no quarter if given the chance to gain military and numerical superiority in the west.  We need to see this for what it is; a direct and intended threat to our very survival.  To do otherwise is to actively commit societal and cultural suicide.  A is A.

Advertisements

2 Responses to “The Mecca of the West”

  1. Thanks for that !! Well said, detailed, and true !
    Ed

  2. Well thought out well written and to the point of our nation’s problem.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: